← United KingdomThe Exclusive FeatureShare your journey
The people who built Britain’s companies · November 2026

Smoothies and fruit drinks

Innocent Drinks

After six months of recipes and £500 of fruit, the three friends ran a stall at a London music festival and asked visitors to drop an empty bottle into a YES or NO bin on whether they should quit their jobs.

Three friends stood at a London music festival with a stall and two bins. One said YES. The other said NO. The question on the sign was whether they should quit their jobs to make smoothies.

They had spent six months working out recipes and about £500 on fruit. Richard Reed, Adam Balon and Jon Wright had met at St John's College, Cambridge. By then they worked in consulting and advertising, steady jobs. The festival was a cheap experiment. Visitors who liked the drinks would drop their empty bottle in the answer they wanted.

It took about fifteen months from idea to market, a slow start for a company that later told its story as a joke.

At the end of the weekend the YES bin was full. Only 3 bottles sat in NO. The next day, the three resigned.

But a bin of bottles is not a bank. What came after is the part that rarely makes the poster. Finding money was hard. They had a product, a jar of encouragement and no revenue. The turn came with Maurice Pinto, a wealthy American businessman, who put in £250,000. It took about fifteen months from idea to market, a slow start for a company that later told its story as a joke.

The business grew. By the mid-2000s Innocent was in a McDonald's Happy Meal trial that would run for five years, and had launched The Big Knit, where people knitted tiny hats for bottles in return for money to charity. But growth had a price. In 2007 the company recalled about 100,000 bottles after reports of smoothie bottles exploding, which it put down to natural fermentation. The Advertising Standards Authority also censured it that year over health claims on its superfoods range.

Then the crash. In 2009 revenue fell and the company lost £8.6m. That year Coca-Cola agreed to buy a stake for £30m, with the founders keeping operational control. The stake rose to 58% in 2010 and past 90% in 2013, leaving the founders with a small minority holding. Ethical Consumer cut the company's rating from 12.5 out of 20 to 6.5 after the sale.

By 2016 revenue was £247.4m, and the company sold more than two million smoothies a week.

What stays with me is the bins. They did not ask a bank, a mentor or a survey panel. They asked strangers who had just tasted the product to do something small and physical. The quit-your-job decision came from evidence rather than courage, and that is easier to repeat than most founders think.

The Chronology year by year

  1. 1998
    • festival bin test, founders resign
  2. 1999
    • product launched
  3. 2003
    • The Big Knit launched
  4. 2007
    • McDonald's Happy Meal trial (ended 2012) and a recall of 100,000 bottles
  5. 2009
    • loss of £8.6m, Coca-Cola stake
  6. 2010
    • Coca-Cola 58%
  7. 2013
    • Coca-Cola over 90%
  8. 2016
    • revenue £247.4m

The Money Trail how it was funded

  1. 1998 Maurice Pinto invested £250,000
  2. Apr 2009 Coca-Cola bought a minority stake for £30m
  3. Apr 2010 Coca-Cola raised stake to 58% for about £65m
  4. Feb 2013 Coca-Cola took over 90%

Principal backers: Maurice Pinto, Coca-Cola

The Close Calls what nearly broke it

  • 2007: recall of 100,000 bottles over fermentation
  • 2007: ASA ruling on superfood health claims
  • 2009: £8.6m loss in the financial crisis
  • 2013: Ethical Consumer cut its rating after the Coca-Cola stake
  • 2022: second ASA ruling on an environmental claim

In Their Own Words from the record

Spotted something wrong? Send a correction.

Startup Talk · Preview edition · Figures are from public sources and may be out of date
About · Contact · Terms · Privacy · Badge · Share your journey