← HomeAll journeys    About    Share your journey
← IndiaThe Exclusive FeatureShare your journey
Startup Talk
The people who built India's companies · November 2026

Used cars / auto commerce

Spinny

Two friends noticed how many people they knew had been burned buying used cars.

It began over coffee. Niraj Singh and Ramanshu Mahaur were talking about something that had nothing to do with startups: how many of their friends had bought a used car, and how miserable it had been.

The stories were all the same. Friends trudged from dealer to dealer, haggled over prices that never felt reasonable, and drove home with a car they could not fully trust. They did not have a bad purchase, Niraj later wrote, so much as 'a sense of doubt about the quality of their purchase.' That doubt stuck with him. He and Ramanshu took the idea to Mohit Gupta and Ganesh Pawar, and all four, in his telling, became convinced it was their next venture. Reports describe Niraj as an IIT Delhi alumnus who put in about $500,000 of his own money to begin.

Friends trudged from dealer to dealer, haggled over prices that never felt reasonable, and drove home with a car they could not fully trust.

The first version, in 2015, was an obvious one: a marketplace where owners could list cars for other individuals to buy. It did not work. Used cars are a business of mistrust, and a website that merely connects strangers does nothing about that. 'The presence of information asymmetry throughout the market quickly became apparent to us,' Niraj wrote. Buyers could not see what the seller knew.

So in 2017 the founders did the harder thing. Instead of introducing buyers to sellers, Spinny would stand in the middle. It would buy cars, put each through a 200-point inspection, price it with its own engine, offer a money-back guarantee, and handle the loan, the title transfer and the delivery. Ten months into the first model they had listed more than 3,000 cars and inspected over 100 a day. The retail model was far heavier on capital, and it had to be: every car Spinny owned was cash sitting in a lot.

That is where the price shows. In FY23 the company lost ₹820 Cr. Marketing spend that year was ₹424 Cr; by FY25 it had been cut to ₹125 Cr, and employee costs fell from ₹392 Cr to ₹338 Cr. Procurement of cars is still about 80% of everything it spends. Sourcing carries its own risks, from dodgy paperwork to hidden accident damage, and refurbishment and re-registration add delay and cost.

The discipline has started to show. In FY25, Spinny's revenue rose 25% to ₹4,657 Cr and its loss narrowed 28% to ₹424 Cr. In June 2025 it raised $170 Mn led by Accel's growth fund at a valuation of roughly $1.7-1.8 Bn, and it is reported to have confidentially filed for an IPO.

The lesson is in the sequence. The founders started with a problem a friend could describe in one sentence, tried the cheap solution, watched it fail for a specific reason, and then paid for the expensive one. Trust was the product all along, and it cost money to build.

The Chronology year by year

  1. 2015
    • founded as a peer-to-peer used-car listing marketplace
  2. 2017
    • moved to a retail model that inspects, prices and sells cars
  3. 2021
    • $283M round
  4. 2025
    • Series F $170M at $1.7-1.8 Bn valuation; FY25 revenue ₹4,657 Cr
  5. 2026
    • confidentially filed IPO papers (reported, up to ~₹3,000 Cr issue)

The Money Trail how it was funded

  1. 2015 Niraj Singh reportedly started with ~$500,000 of own funds
  2. early investors reported as Blume Ventures, Smile Ventures, Accel, SAIF Partners, Alteria Capital
  3. Dec 2021 ~$283M (ADQ, Tiger Global, Avenir Growth)
  4. Jun 2025 Series F $170M (Accel Leaders Fund
  5. WestBridge Capital and Fundamentum also participated)

Principal backers: Tiger Global, General Catalyst, Abu Dhabi Growth Fund (ADQ), Accel, Avenir Growth Capital, WestBridge Capital, Fundamentum

The Close Calls what nearly broke it

  • 2015-17: the peer-to-peer model did not work in a trust-driven category, forcing a pivot to retail in 2017
  • FY23: net loss of ₹820 Cr as the inventory-led model locked up working capital; ongoing: sourcing risks (paperwork problems, hidden accident or odometer issues) and refurbishment and re-registration costs; pre-2023 stock may face E20 ethanol-fuel compatibility concerns

In Their Own Words from the record

Spotted something wrong? Send a correction.

Startup Talk · Preview edition · Figures are from public sources and may be out of date